How can you prevent that? Define an important rule of thumb: „Silence means agreement“ or „who agrees to empty,“ as we have known for centuries. There is a legal expression „silence is tolerance“ that I have used in the economy. A draft text is distributed among participants who have one last opportunity to propose changes or changes to the text. If no amendments are proposed before the expiry of the procedure (if no one breaks the silence), the text is considered adopted by all participants. Often, this procedure is the last step in the adoption of the text, after the fundamental premises of the text have been agreed in previous negotiations. „Breaking the silence“ is only a last resort in case a participant still has basic problems with parts of the text and is therefore the exception rather than the rule. Apply the rule of silence and consensus only if a weak consensus is sufficient. Silence and consensus do not apply when strong consensus or mandatory discussion is required. If real people are affected by a decision, such as blocking users. B or the use of material covered by biographies of the politics of the living people, a positive confirmation is preferred. But even in these cases, disagreements may arise later and it is no longer appropriate to adopt a consensus.
Wikipedia is huge and the time of our editors is limited. At all times, there is a lot of open discussion on many different topics throughout the project. We encourage our editors to be courageous, and it is very likely that at some point you will be affected by the outcome of a decision that you did not know or had no chance of joining. Where a decision is based primarily on silence, it is particularly important to remember that consensus can change. First, silence is the assumption that the bidder gives the bidder the impression that silence is considered a hypothesis. See National Union Fire Insurance Co. Ehrlich, 122 Misc. 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924).
For example, sometimes the establishment and reinforcement of „silence“ is enough to bring opinions into the river. But if you feel that some participants are still struggling to express themselves freely, consider the following tactic that allows perspectives to be aired in a way that focuses on ideas rather than the individuals who express them. The only time the U.S. Supreme Court has discussed silent agreements in recent history is in the case of Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp. The Tribunal found that tacit agreements between the parties do not necessarily permit arbitration for a later class, unless there is a contractual basis for that arbitration procedure. 3. Silence is deemed broken when a participating state has written to the President of an objection or amendment before the expiry of the period of silence. In this case, the President immediately informs the participating States in writing that the decision in question has not been adopted. Third, silence is the assumption that a bidder unlawfully exercised control of the goods sent to it for approval or control. In this case, the bidder is contractually obliged to purchase the goods at the specified price.
The bidder will be obliged to purchase the goods, even if they never intended to buy it. For example: Of course, it is not practical to wait forever for confirmation: in the meantime, it is sometimes better to assume that silence implies consensus. You can keep this assumption (hopefully safe) until someone changes the page by reworking it or resetting it. The more visible the statement is and the more unchallenged it remains, the stronger the consensus implication. (d) for the implementation of the common foreign and security policy through the COREU (coreu-taie) network.